Submit Story

Homepage
All CNHINS News
    Crime
    Disasters
    Education
    Environment
    General news
    Latino
    Military
    Government
    Politics
    Weather
Lifestyle
    Arts
    Automotive
    Books
    Entertainment
    Faith
    Family
    Fashion
    Fitness
    Food
    Garden
    Health
    Homes
    How-to
    Local history
    Medicine
    Science
    Seniors
    Technology
    Travel
Opinion
    Columns
    Editorials
Sports
    Sports, college
    Sports, high school
    Sports, local
    Sports Opinion
    Outdoors
    Sports, pro
Business
    Agriculture
    Energy / Oil and Gas
    Finance
    Real estate
CNHIns Originals
Talkers

News & reporting
Page design
Photography
On the Web
Ethics and Standards
Management and culture

Tom Lindley
national editor
812-282-1012 tlindley@cnhi.com

J.B. Blosser Bittner
deputy national editor
405-255-2985
jbittner@cnhi.com

Bill Ketter
CNHI vice president for editorial
978-946-2233
wketter@cnhi.com

December 02, 2007 12:23 am

Editorial: Co-Gen plant

It’s been more than five years since plans were unveiled for the Western Greenbrier Co-Generation plant.


CNHI News Service

Editorial: Co-Gen plant
There should have been better planning to address possible obstacles

Opinion: The Register-Herald, Beckley, W.Va.


It’s been more than five years since plans were unveiled for the Western Greenbrier Co-Generation plant.
It was hailed as “the flagship project” in the advancement of clean coal technology. The 98-megawatt power plant would burn coal from a nearby gob pile and generate enough electricity to power 85,000 homes. It would also provide low-cost electricity for a proposed eco-park housing a variety of businesses. It promised hundreds of local jobs and a tremendous economic boost for the area.
In January 2003, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded the project $107.5 million, half of the estimated $215 million cost. The other 50 percent was expected to be raised from the sale of bonds.
Much has happened in the years since. For one, the total cost of the project is now estimated at $400 million or more, about double the original figure.
A government Environmental Impact Statement, all 1,590 pages of it, took nearly five years to complete, further delaying matters.
And now, the West Virginia Economic Development Authority is on the hook for $3 million if the plant does not get built. The EDA had guaranteed $3 million of a $4.87 million loan made to Western Greenbrier Co-Generation by First National Bank of Ronceverte — money to cover the local match to pay for engineering and feasibility studies. The EDA has begun processing a claim for the $3 million after the bank decided not to extend the loan.
This wasn’t how it was supposed to work.
David Warner, the EDA’s executive director, said in the time it took to complete the engineering and feasibility studies, “project costs escalated and it’s tougher to put a successful financing package in place. Not impossible, just more difficult in today’s environment.”
The project is not dead. Officials hope to sell bonds in the spring, which would pay creditors, but instead of a bond sale of $107.5 million, the figure is now $300 million. It could be another three years before the plant is completed.
“You can only issue ‘X’ amount of bonds at a certain interest rate and be able to pay it back with the revenue of an electric generating plant,” Warner said.
“It is still possible, and we are hoping there is a company or an entity that can step in and give them the opportunity to keep putting these things in place. The project is not necessarily dead — the underlying financing has just run out.”
The point here is not to assess blame. It’s just with a project of this magnitude, there should have been better planning all the way around to address all possible obstacles.

© 2008 Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI News Service
3500 Colonnade Parkway, Suite 600, Birmingham, AL 35243; (205) 298-7100